13 July ARELJ Case Note - Guidance on the principles that apply to a decision of the Warden under S 122E of the Mining Act 1978 (WA) in respect of the removal of a caveat Richore Pty Ltd v Cougar Metals NL [2020] WAWC 1 July 13, 2020 By AMPLA Admin ARELJ, Mining ARELJ, CaseNote, WesternAustralia, WardensCourt 0 Tom Barrett Senior Associate, Johnson Winter & Slattery On 30 April 2020, Warden O’Sullivan handed down his decision in Richore Pty Ltd v Cougar Metals NL [2020] WAMC 1, which concerned a plaint for the removal of a caveat from mining lease M 39/159. Warden O’Sullivan’s decision is an illustration of the approach to be taken by a warden in deciding whether to direct the removal of a caveat under s 122E of the Mining Act 1978 (WA). Member Login Required to Access Case Note Read More Related Articles ARELJ Case Note - Applications For Extension Of Time To Lodge An Objection Under The Mining Act 1978 (WA) ARELJ Case Note - Applying the Cautionary Principle to Harvesting Timber in Victoria ARELJ - Case Note - Yindjibarndi Case “Occupation Requirement” Authority ARELJ Case Note - Health And Safety: Duties Of Persons Conducting A Business Or Undertaking ARELJ Case Note - Implications of New Provisions in the Human Rights Act Following Waratah Coal Decision ARELJ - Case Note - Judgement Clarifies Extent of Non-Conforming Use Protections Showing 0 Comment Comments are closed.