13 July ARELJ Case Note - Guidance on the principles that apply to a decision of the Warden under S 122E of the Mining Act 1978 (WA) in respect of the removal of a caveat Richore Pty Ltd v Cougar Metals NL  WAWC 1 July 13, 2020 By AMPLA Admin ARELJ, Mining ARELJ, CaseNote, WesternAustralia, WardensCourt 0 Tom Barrett Senior Associate, Johnson Winter & Slattery On 30 April 2020, Warden O’Sullivan handed down his decision in Richore Pty Ltd v Cougar Metals NL  WAMC 1, which concerned a plaint for the removal of a caveat from mining lease M 39/159. Warden O’Sullivan’s decision is an illustration of the approach to be taken by a warden in deciding whether to direct the removal of a caveat under s 122E of the Mining Act 1978 (WA). Member Login Required to Access Case Note Read More Related Articles ARELJ Case Note - Applications For Extension Of Time To Lodge An Objection Under The Mining Act 1978 (WA) ARELJ Case Note - Applying the Cautionary Principle to Harvesting Timber in Victoria ARELJ Case Note - Health And Safety: Duties Of Persons Conducting A Business Or Undertaking ARELJ - Case Note - Judgement Clarifies Extent of Non-Conforming Use Protections ARELJ Case Note - Clark V Minister For The Environment  FCA 2027 How COVID-19 could change mining for the better The mining industry was deemed an essential service by the Government, which has enabled it to continue to operate during the COVID-19 pandemic. However, this hasn’t been without its challenges. New processes and procedures were required to address safety and social distancing and issues of supply and worker mobility have impacted how the industry operates. But with adversity comes opportunity and the mining industry has thrived and realised the potential for new improvements amidst the pandemic. Showing 0 Comment Comments are closed.